<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Currency on UV Curing China</title>
		<link>http://uv-curing-china.com/en/tags/currency/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Currency on UV Curing China</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 07:37:48 +0800</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="http://uv-curing-china.com/en/tags/currency/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>UV lamp for currency verification</title>
				<link>http://uv-curing-china.com/en/posts/uv-lamp-for-currency-verification/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 07:37:48 +0800</pubDate>
				<guid>http://uv-curing-china.com/en/posts/uv-lamp-for-currency-verification/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;http://uv-curing-china.com/images/4ef091ebd1d1ab3051c066137aa328dc.png&#34; alt=&#34;UV lamp for currency verification&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;On a banknote inspection line, the UV lamp isn’t just another part. It’s the gatekeeper for authenticity. The 365nm signature needs to be repeatable, shift after shift, day after day. But when the incoming voltage dips and surges under load, the lamp arc gets shaky, the spectral output drifts, and the verification algorithm starts throwing exceptions. Counterfeit risk goes up. Reject rates climb. Operators end up chasing false positives instead of running a clean, high-throughput inspection.&#xA;Voltage instability rarely shows up as a single catastrophic failure. It shows up as drift: lower peak irradiance, longer warm-ups, inconsistent fluorescence from the same banknote ink, and more borderline calls that force manual re-checks. In currency verification, “almost stable” isn’t good enough. You need output that holds steady in the face of real plant power conditions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
